Jules Halpern then took over, and he treated the clown with respect and seriousness. First, he asked him to state his credentials, which the clown did, politely. Then Halpern asked, “And what brings you here today?”
“I did a party for Mr. Shafer out in Kalorama on the fateful and terrible night of the murder. It was his twins’ fifth birthday. I did a party when they were four as well. I brought a video along. Want to see?” he said, speaking as if he were addressing a crowd of three-year-olds.
“Of course,” said Jules Halpern.
“Objection!” Catherine Fitzgibbon called out loudly.
The video was admitted over the prosecution’s objections and after yet another lengthy sidebar. The newspapers had claimed that Judge Fescoe was intimidated by Jules Halpern, which seemed the case.
The tape began with an arresting close-up of a painting of a clown’s face. As the camera pulled back, everyone in the courtroom could see it was the sign on Silly Billy’s van, which was parked in front of a handsome redbrick town house with a glass conservatory linked to the main building. The Shafer house.
The next scene showed Silly Billy ringing the front bell and apparently surprising the Shafer children at the door.
Once again, the prosecution objected to the videotape. There was another sidebar. The lawyers returned to their seats, and the tape resumed.
The other children at the birthday party then ran to the door. The clown handed out toys from a sack slung over his shoulder —teddy bears, dolls, shiny red fire trucks.
Silly Billy then performed magic tricks and gags on the sun porch, which looked out onto the backyard. The yard was very pretty, with potted orange trees, white climbing roses, a jasmine vine, lush green grass.
“Wait! I hear something outside!” he turned and said into the camera. He ran and disappeared from sight.
The kids all followed. The tension of surprise and imminent fun showed in the children’s eyes.
A cream-colored pony appeared, cantering slowly around the corner of the house. Silly Billy was riding the pony.
But when the clown dismounted, the kids discovered that the clown was actually Geoffrey Shafer! All the kids went wild, but especially the Shafer twins. They ran and hugged their daddy, who seemed the perfect father.
There were heartwarming candid shots of the children eating frosted cake and playing party games. There were more shots of Shafer laughing and playing with several of the children. I suspected that Jules Halpern had supervised the final editing of the tape. It was very convincing.
The adult guests at the party, all dressed up and looking sophisticated, gave glowing testimonials. They said that Geoffrey Shafer and his wife were outstanding parents. No longer in his clown costume but in a smart navy suit, Shafer modestly deflected the tributes. He had changed into the same clothes he wore when he was apprehended at the Farragut.
The tape ended with the smiling
and quite beautiful twins telling the camera that they loved their mommy and daddy for making their “dream come true.” The lights came up. The judge granted a brief recess.
I felt incredibly angry that the video had been shown. It made Shafer out to be a wonderful father—and such a victim.
The jury was all smiles, and so was Jules Halpern. He had argued masterfully that the tape was crucial to establishing Geoffrey Shafer’s state of mind shortly before Patsy Hampton’s murder. Halpern was so skillful an orator that he’d actually made the outrageous request to show the video sound logical. At any rate, it was moot now.
Shafer himself was smiling broadly, as were his wife and son. It suddenly occurred to me that Shafer had been riding a pale horse at the party for his children. He was Death, from the Four Horsemen.
It was all theater and games to him, his entire life.
Chapter 92
SOMETIMES I WANTED to shut my eyes tight and not have to watch another moment of the trial. I wanted things to be the way they’d been before the Weasel.
Catherine Fitzgibbon was doing a very good job with each witness, but the judge seemed to be favoring the defense whenever possible. It had begun at the critical suppression hearing, and it continued now.
Lucy Shafer took the witness stand early that afternoon. The warm, homespun videotaped images of the Shafer family were still fresh in the minds of the jurors.
I had been trying to understand Lucy Shafer’s odd and perplexing relationship with her husband since the first time I met her, on the night of Patsy Hampton’s murder. What kind of woman could live with an unrepentant monster like Shafer and not know it? Could this woman be that much in denial? Or was there something else that motivated her, somehow held her captive to Shafer? I had seen all kinds of marital relationships in my therapy practice, but nothing like this.
Jane Halpern conducted the questioning, and looked every bit as confident and winning as her father. She was tall and slender, with wiry black hair tied in a bow with a dark-crimson ribbon. She was twenty-eight, just four years out of Yale Law School, but seemed older and wiser.
“Mrs. Shafer, how long have you and your husband known each other?”
Lucy Shafer spoke in a gentle but clear voice. “I’ve known Geoffrey for most of my adult life, actually. My father was his commanding officer in the army. I believe I was just fourteen when I first met Geoff. He was nine years older. We married when I was nineteen, after my second year at Cambridge. Once, when I was studying for exams, he showed up at university in full military dress—polished saber, medals, shiny black leather riding boots—right in the middle of the library. I was studying in a sweatshirt or some such awful getup, and I don’t think I’d washed my hair in days. Geoff told me it didn’t matter. He didn’t care a bit about appearances. He said he loved me and always would. I must tell you, he’s kept that promise.”